Today is November 4 and that means here in the US we vote for the next president. I won’t go on some long thing here about how important voting is here but I will say this. Those that know me also know that I can be pretty cynical when it comes to government and politics, but I do feel strongly that voting is an important responsibility that informed citizens have. Emphasis on “informed.”
I personally am a firm Independent (some might say Constitutionalist) and I’m extremely jaded to the very partisan nature of our political system. All the more then I feel the responsibility falls to the voter then to do the research themselves and decide on their own who the better candidate is. I also feel that the responsibility of the voter is to vote what is best for the nation, even if there are some aspects of that choice which might impact that voter negatively. I make this argument because I feel that if the nation is prospering fully then each individual has better opportunities to proper as well. So what might seem as a potential negative impact to that voter will actually benefit them, given some time.
That said I will come right out and say I have no doubts that Obama is the president that the United States needs at this time.
So, I went to my local polling place first thing this morning to take care of my civic duty. I manged to go at a good time. Just after the initial rush and before the second wave showed up so I only had to wait in line about 10 minutes. I cast my ballot for Obama/Biden and then walked out of the polling place with a smile on my face. I felt good. The weather was and is beautiful here today. It feels like this will be a good day.
A couple notes about Michigan proposals. I voted in favor of medicinal marijuana and for additional stem cell research. For the first proposal I feel that the law was structured in a responsible way and further more I am against the criminalization of most all drugs. That’s not to say I’m personally pro-drug, I just feel that there are more constructive ways of dealing with people who have drug abuse problems than the criminalization of it. For the second I rather strongly feel that stem cell research is an important area of medical and bioscience research that has wide reaching implications for the future. Michigan of all places which needs to move (quickly) to an inovation based economy needs this to pass.
by Naim on November 4, 2008
The LA Times has reported that CA will begin subsidizing E85. Now, I know that I’ve made my views relatively clear, so it should come to no shock that I’m not really pleased with California’s decision to push this form of energy (at the very least in its current incarnation). What is a bit shocking (at least to me) is that California is – for the most part – quite well informed when it comes to these things and often makes some good decisions. This one is not though and seems more like hopping on the political E85 bandwagon.
Just as a refresher the reason why I think this is a horrible idea is because E85 produced from corn (which is what they’re hinting at in the article) has net impact on the environment that is worse than gasoline. This is due to the fact that refining ethanol from corn is a very inefficient process. Couple that with the fact that with the fact that current E85 powertrains actually have lower fuel efficiency and higher emissions than gasoline or diesel engines and it’s just silly. Oh and as I may have mentioned before the jury seems to be leaning toward the fact that the ethanol emissions may in fact be worse for the environment than those from pure hydrocarbon based fuels.
Last two issues aside, I would have thought that the fact that it takes a good deal more fossil fuels to create ethanol from corn would be enough to prevent this from happening. The really odd thing is that it’s not like California is even completely unaware of this. Their 2007 Climate Action Programs document states:
[...] When used as a trans-portation fuel, a gallon of cellulosic ethanol (made from rice straw or sugar cane) produces 70 percent less greenhouse gases than a gallon of gasoline. [source (PDF)]
So clearly someone over there understands at least part of what’s going on. Why then this move? It’s a pretty bold one and somewhat troubling too. Up till this point I was rather happy that E85 wasn’t pushed more heavily in California. To me it showed that they realized what the problems with it were and they were holding out for a more sustainable energy product. This then goes back on that in a big way, not only for that state (with its huge population) but because California is in many ways a trend setter when it comes to environmental policy.
The fact alone that it will become a state law in 2010 that all fuel sold in the state will become an E10 blend (nearly double the current ethanol in the mix) will have far reaching impacts. Throw subsidies into the mix and at worst you will get a lot of adoption (which will not be good for the environment or our economy) and at the very least you tie up government funds in a poorly thought out program.
by Naim on February 27, 2008
Subscribe